I have the same problem, so there may be something wrong with the list exploder. -Philipp Tapio Kaijanen a écrit : > > Dear PSO-PC memebers > > I have started to get these messages in douple sometimes in quartets. Do you > have the same proplem and can we do somethingh about it? > Of course I like to hear from you more often. > > Tapio > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Leslie Daigle" <leslie@thinkingcat.com> > To: <azucena.hernandez@POP3.TELEFONICA.ES> > Cc: "Androuchko, Vladimir" <vladimir.androuchko@itu.int>; "pso-pc, ITU > (MLIST)" <pso-pc@ties.itu.int> > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:08 PM > Subject: Re: PSO-PC Alternative Roots Position > > > Howdy, > > > > If I have followed the proposed edits correctly, that makes the > > proposed text as attached...? > > > > Leslie. > > > > -- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The best laid plans > > are written in pencil." > > -- ThinkingCat > > > > Leslie Daigle > > leslie@thinkingcat.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > > > > Dear Stuart, > > On behalf of the Protocol Council, I'm sending you the Position of the > > PSO-PC on the Alternative Roots Issue. It was agreed that each Protocol > > Supporting Organization gives also its comments/statements concerning > > the Alternative Roots Issue. > > > > The PSO Statement is: > > > > "The Internet DNS currently operates using a Single Authoritative Root > > Server System. Although, it would be technically possible to devise and > > standardize a fully compliant alternative multiple root server system, > > there appears to be no technical reason for changing from the present > > working system, as this would require the development of a new set of > > protocols for use by the DNS." > > > > Additional IETF statement: > > > > "The Internet currently operates using a tree-structured name space > > known as the DNS. Of necessity, such a name space must have a single, > > authoritative root. Moving to a model that would not require such a > > single, authoritative root would require replacing the present, working > > DNS with some other system. Such a replacement would require the > > development of a new naming paradigm, as well as the protocols and > > software to implement it. Developing and deploying such replacement > > protocols would take years, and would have enormous potential for > > disruption of the Internet. IETF does not see any technical benefit > > in such an effort." > > > > The ITU-T Study Group 2 conclusion on the Alternative Roots Issue, > > which was reached during the ITU-T Study Group 2 meeting (Geneva, 4-14 > > September 2001) states: > > > > "Study Group 2 has noted the PSO statement and has no objections to it. > > However, Study Group 2 notes that there may be other issues in > > addition to technical reasons such as administrative and national > > sovereignty considerations." > > > > ETSI supported the ITU-T Study Group 2 Statement and the IETF Statement. > > W3C supported IETF Statement. > > > > > >