Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-unencoded-digest-04: (with COMMENT)

Apologies for the delay Deb.


On Mon, Mar 30, 2026, at 23:20, Deb Cooley wrote:
> side channel sentence:  Section 4 para 2 of RFC 8188 uses side channel in the way that I normally see it used, while Section 4.6 uses side-channel (w/ a hyphen) differently. Given this conflicting use (does the hyphen make that big of a difference?), I think dropping the sentence is the best option.
> 
> SHOULD NOT?:  The rework of this sentence into two sentences looks much better.  

I captured our discussion as an issue https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/3455 and have landed the changes we got alignment on in https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/3456. This will be incorporated into the next published draft revision this week.

Thanks again for the feedback!

Received on Thursday, 18 June 2026 01:28:55 UTC