OK, here's something cosmetic that I'd like to fix in draft 01: we have currently a few entries in the References section that aren't used in the specification text. In particular: 1) RFC1866 (HTML 2.0) - this seems to be a leftover from RFC2068 (definition of the LINK header, gone from RFC2616) 2) RFC2069 (Digest Auth) - again, a leftover from RFC2068, obsoleted by RFC2617. 3) RFC2026 (Standards Process) - only used in the front matter, I don't think it needs to appear in the References section. Any objections to those being removed in draft 01? Best regards, JulianReceived on Thursday, 19 October 2006 12:20:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:28 UTC