- From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 13:50:44 +0000
- To: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Koen Holtman wrote: > Scott Lawrence: > [...] > >It is better to specify Max-Age though and avoid clock skew problems. > > Note however that just setting max-age will not work for most HTTP/1.0 > clients, which don't know about max-age. On the current internet I > would still recommend the use of Expires, though adding a max-age too > won't hurt. Naive question: can you specify Max-Age on a 1.1 response and Expires on a 1.0 response? Or are you likely to run into problems with proxies giving the 1.1 response to 1.0 clients? (I know they're not supposed to.) -- /=============================================================\ |John Stracke | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK | |francis@ecal.com|============================================| |Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed | |eCal Corp. | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch | \=============================================================/
Received on Saturday, 22 May 1999 06:57:24 UTC