- From: Ross Patterson <ROSSP@ss1.reston.vmd.sterling.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 98 17:17:45 EST
- To: jg@pa.dec.com, http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) writes: >Before it isn't too late (i.e. today), please look over the responses >I (and some others) have made to the issues raised since IETF last call. I'm very satisfied with the state of affairs as reflected in the issues list today (Wednesday - sorry Jim!). Nice work, as usual. There is one question I'm aware of (because I raised it ;-) ) that doesn't appear on the issues list and hasn't provoked any traffic on this list. It has to do with the general syntax of headers and a change between HTTP 1.0 and 1.1 that appears accidental. See http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/hypermail/1998q4/0019.html for the original message. It's not by any means a show-stopper, but if it was accidentally missed I'd like to see it addressed. If it was intentionally omitted, that's not going to give me any heartburn. Ross Patterson VM Software Division Sterling Software, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 1998 14:31:30 UTC