- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 08:58:51 -0500
- To: "Life is hard... and then you die." <Ronald.Tschalaer@psi.ch>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
At 07:16 11/20/97 +0100, Life is hard... and then you die. wrote: >Is there any reason we can't change > > An HTTP/1.1 sender MAY include a Trailer header field in a message >using > chunked transfer-coding with a non-empty trailer. Doing so allows the > recipient to know which header fields to expect in the trailer. > >to > > An HTTP/1.1 sender SHOULD include a Trailer header field in a message >using > chunked transfer-coding with a non-empty trailer. Doing so allows the > recipient to know which header fields to expect in the trailer. > >? Is this because of already installed implementations? Yes, we can't upgrade that requirement. Henrik -- Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk
Received on Thursday, 20 November 1997 06:03:59 UTC