Re: If-None-Match and IMS (new Issue IMS_INM_MISMATCH)

• From: David W. Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
• Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 23:00:26 -0800 (PST)
• To: Jim Gettys <jg@pa.dec.com>
• Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971111225851.21345K-100000@shell1.aimnet.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 1997, Jim Gettys wrote:

> This documents discussions on the implementation list that shows
> a new protocol issue (IMS_INM_MISMATCH).

My recollection of intent matches the implementation Roy described.
If-None-Match supercedes IMS when both are present.

Dave Morris

Received on Tuesday, 11 November 1997 23:08:34 UTC