Re: OPTIONS method

• From: David W. Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
• Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 16:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
• To: Josh <josh@netscape.com>
• Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU>, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
• Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970615160053.26241B-100000@shell1.aimnet.com>

On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Josh wrote:

> Therefore, I think that a modification to the OPTIONS method
> or an additional header would suffice to determine 
> if an important capability is present.

Perhaps I've missed something ... isn't this sort of situation supposed to
be handled by PEP?

Dave Morris

Received on Sunday, 15 June 1997 16:07:19 UTC