- From: Anselm Baird_Smith <abaird@www43.inria.fr>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 13:01:12 +0100 (MET)
- To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Jeffrey Mogul writes: > ... > Putting it all together, the "sufficiently fresh" function > would be > > SuffFresh(Ae, Ap, Ar, Sr, Fr) := min(Ap, Ar) < (Ae + Fr - Sr) Looks fine... > > Regarding your second table, which indicates whether a cache > entry is usable with or without revalidation, I think we first > need to nail down the semantics of "proxy-revalidate". Yes, I would very much like to consider also the cases of "private disconnected" and "shared disconnected" caches (for which I have left the table blank). Let me know if I can help, Anselm.
Received on Monday, 6 January 1997 04:09:26 UTC