- From: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 11:22:48 -0700
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Roy T. Fielding writes: > > It would, if it were there in earlier versions of the protocol. In > > 1.0 all you get is mashed User-Agent headers and the occasional > > Forwarded header, if you're lucky. It would be far more reliable to > > make it mandatory for 1.1 servers to "report on their neighbors". > > Please read the description of the Via header field. It does that. > > > ...Roy T. Fielding > Department of Information & Computer Science (fielding@ics.uci.edu) > University of California, Irvine, CA 92717-3425 fax:+1(714)824-4056 > http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/ > Duh. Another misreading on my part. Never mind. I'm glad it does what I wanted it to, anyway. --Shel
Received on Thursday, 6 June 1996 11:41:21 UTC