- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 22:38:36 PST
- To: robm@netscape.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Folks, We're discussing two specifications: HTTP/1.0: an informational draft about what current practice was HTTP/1.x: a proposed standard about what HTTP should be. I occasionally get private and public messages about various vendor's products that they're shipping and whether the spec could either make them illegal or how product ship dates interfere with our work here. As far as the extra port number on Host goes, if you're proposing that we put it into the HTTP/1.0 spec, well, it probably could fit into the appendix along with all the other stuff that is roughly implemented in various places but inconsistently. This doesn't preclude us declaring that Host: in HTTP/1.x should not have a port number. Right?
Received on Monday, 22 January 1996 22:42:45 UTC