Re: domain-name?

I'm not into compromises today.  Either we go with the Orig-URI header
as specified in draft 01, or we go with

  Host: fully.qualified.domain.name

as I originally suggested in

  <http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/hypermail/1995q1/0088.html>

I am calling for WG consensus on this issue RIGHT NOW.  If you have
a preference either way, send your comment in RIGHT NOW.  If some
degree of rough consensus can be obtained within the next 5 days,
then I will include the decision in HTTP/1.1 draft 00.

After 5 days, this issue will be permantently barred from future
discussion on this list.  Is that clear?


 ....Roy T. Fielding  Department of ICS, University of California, Irvine USA
                      Visiting Scholar, MIT/LCS + World-Wide Web Consortium
                      (fielding@w3.org)                (fielding@ics.uci.edu)

Received on Thursday, 21 September 1995 14:21:56 UTC