Re: Versioned & unversioned resource

Geoffrey M. Clemm (geoffrey.clemm@rational.com)
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:38:08 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Minor nit on v2.3 of webdav versioning spec"
Previous message: Eric Sedlar: "Minor nit on v2.3 of webdav versioning spec"
In reply to: Eric Sedlar: "Versioned & unversioned resource"

Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:38:08 -0500
Message-Id: <9911191338.AA06394@tantalum>
From: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <008601bf3229$0ba31bb0$79442382@us.oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Versioned & unversioned resource

That is correct.  You can't go from a versioned resource to an
unversioned resource without losing data (i.e. all the history).

You can of course COPY a revision of a versioned resource into
an unversioned collection, and thereby create an unversioned
resource.

Cheers,
Geoff

   From: "Eric Sedlar" <esedlar@us.oracle.com>

   It looks like the current spec allows an unversioned resource to become =
   versioned, but not the reverse.  Is that correct?

   Thanks,

     Eric Sedlar

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Minor nit on v2.3 of webdav versioning spec"
Previous message: Eric Sedlar: "Minor nit on v2.3 of webdav versioning spec"
In reply to: Eric Sedlar: "Versioned & unversioned resource"