Re: Target-Selector value
Jeff McAffer OTT (Jeff_McAffer@oti.com)
Tue, 05 Oct 1999 12:36:08 -0400
From: Jeff_McAffer@oti.com (Jeff McAffer OTT)
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org (ietf-dav-versioning)
Message-ID: <1999Oct05.123200.1250.1342211@otismtp.ott.oti.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 12:36:08 -0400
Subject: RE: Target-Selector value
> <tpe>
> I can easily imagine revision selectors being Integers -- these would
> collide with labels that are equivalent String form of Integers;
> i.e.
> revisionid: 3
> label: 3
> </tpe>
> <jra>
> The revision could never been labeled "3" as this conflicts
> with an existing
> revision name.
> </jra>
<jm>
A couple things to note.
1) The spec currently does not state this. revision-ids are described as
unique amongst the set of other revision-ids on a resource but labels are
much more weakly defined.
2) If names are in fact unique, then why do we have rsr-label and
rsr-revision-id elements? There should just be an rsr-name element as a
names are labels or revision-ids.
</jm>