Re: Compare reports
jamsden@us.ibm.com
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 11:19:29 -0400
From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
To: Jeff_McAffer@oti.com (Jeff McAffer OTT)
cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <85256801.00542813.00@d54mta03.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 11:19:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Compare reports
See <jra> below...
Jeff_McAffer@oti.com (Jeff McAffer OTT) on 10/04/99 06:42:07 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org (ietf-dav-versioning)
cc:
Subject: Compare reports
What is the form of the compare report elements (e.g., how does a
DAV:added specify what was added?)
Is it different when comparing configurations, collections, activities?
That is,
- For configurations we could report resource-ids that were
added/deleted/changed or paths relative to the roots of the
configurations.
<jra>
There could be multiple levels within the report. First differences in
activities, then collections, then resources.
</jra>
- For collections we report paths relative to the collections being
compared.
<jra>
Sounds fine. What was added or deleted.
</jra>
- For activities, ????
<jra>
The differences between activities are what resources were changed in them. The
merge conflict report would be a subset.
</jra>
- For Workspaces??? (What does it mean to compare to workspaces?)
<jra>
What different revisions would be selected?
</jra>
Jeff