Re: Version issues
Jim Whitehead (ejw@ics.uci.edu)
Thu, 1 Apr 1999 17:00:42 -0800
From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
To: Versioning <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 17:00:42 -0800
Message-ID: <004101be7ca4$3b84eb00$d115c380@ics.uci.edu>
Subject: Re: Version issues
-----Original Message-----
From: Geoffrey M. Clemm [mailto:gclemm@tantalum.atria.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 1999 9:59 PM
To: ckaler@microsoft.com
Cc: jamsden@us.ibm.com; ejw@ics.uci.edu; dgd@cs.bu.edu;
Cragun.Bruce@gw.novell.com; bradley_sergeant@intersolv.com
Subject: Re: Version issues
Ooops. It turns out my preceding message just parroted Jim's subsequent
message (i.e. the request/plea to compromise). Sorry about the repetition.
From: Chris Kaler <ckaler@microsoft.com>
... I'm right there with you, if we can have parallel checkouts
and non-tip checkouts for level 1 clients.
It sounds like a key issue is parallel development at level 1.
I believe a Workspace can be treated at level 1 as the kind
of checkout token that Chris wants, and optional helper methods
can be defined that make it act like the checkout methods that
Bruce wants. This would then all be compatible with the extended
use of a Workspace at level 2 for revision-selection purposes.
I'll try to write something up along these lines sometime next week.
Cheers,
Geoff