- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:39:01 +0100
- To: xsl-editors@w3.org
2009-10-09T09:52:33Z Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20/ Author: Dave Pawson. Comments to xsl-editors@w3.org Assumption. I agree with or am neutral on any para not mentioned explicitly in this set of comments. 2.1.1. Very supportive. Excellent inclusion. 2.1.1.1 Open issue: 7562. font-size='auto'. I find it unclear how this is an issue? It seems quite logical. typo: "the size of the initial cap MUST then be included in the blog-progression-direction dimension of the block." 2.1.1.2 This seems a form of syntactic sugar for a negative value of 2.1.1? Which makes it unclear what a negative number would indicate? Would that make a negative value for initial-cap-lines-before the same as a positive value for initial-cap-lines? Lots of room for confusion? 2.2 Excellent addition! Very clear requirement. Open issue: 7564 "Should users be able to direct marginalia to another region, or only to a predefined marginalia area? " IMHO, no. Keeps a clear definition of marginalia. Open issue: 7566. Dynamic behaviour of marginalia areas. Suggest leave static, since it is the authors decision. 2.2.1.3 "distance" Perhaps better named as 'dimension', since that is how it is described? Even when it is a percentage this makes more sense. page-viewpot-area. typo. 2.2.2.1 fo:marginalia A simple example early in this para would make descriptions clearer. 2.2.2.2 I'm unsure how I'd relate this marginalia to region-body content for alignment purposes. Is it the 'marginalia-destination-area'? Again, an example might clarify. 2.3.2.1 block-progression-unit I'm unsure about this one until I see it implemented. I can see it looking really quite ugly with gross dimensioning. 2.3.3 Vertical alignment within a page or column Very happy to see that appearing! Open issue: 7567 should vertical justification also apply to fo:table-cell, for instance? What other areas? Yes, IMHO. 3.1.1 Considerations particularly decimal alignment. suggest this be limited to a single page (page based media) due to performance hits. 3.2 Table header/footer on boundaries Yes!!! An alternative for consideration? ... if (X='boundary-condition1') alternative content 1 elif (X='boundary-condition2') alternative content 2 That way, it doesn't need to be restricted to table headers? Could be a section/chapter head etc. Even a para. 3.2.6 Spanning cell over all row and columns Zero as a value seems to be a case of seeing a bad example and following it? 'all' seems far more practical and intuitive. The terminology for properties is becoming depressingly obtuse. 3.4.1 fo:spread-page-master Very welcome! 3.5 Bleeds and Trim More weak, old fashioned terminology? It may be accurate and appropriate for a typographer and setter. Is it appropriate for the user of this specification? IMHO - no. 5.1. Fonts. Look forward to it. Seems far too complex and implementation dependent as it currently stands. 7. Images. Ability to centre an image vertically on a page. Here or earlier? I.e. Leave a header and an image as an odd page decoration or to break some sort of page sequence 7.4. Callouts yes please! 'Ensure positioning, so I can label aunt Izabel and uncle Joe. 8.3. I'll guess others have asked for this... How to balance what is done here vs what properly belongs in printer setup and properties? IMHO this all belongs in printer properties. Regards DaveP -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 11 October 2009 12:39:33 UTC