xml-editor@w3.org from January to March 1999 by thread

Sorry for the Inconvenience. info@heavengate.com (Tuesday, 23 March)

Marketing/Advertising Proposal - Please Read! tiga@laislaescondida.com (Sunday, 21 March)

[yergeau@alis.com: More errata] C M Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 17 March)

xml:lang Mike Aigen (Wednesday, 10 March)

"For interoperability" and "must" don't mix John Cowan (Tuesday, 9 March)

Posible Errata in XML 1.0 W3C Recommendation 10-February-1998 Gonzalez Provost, Javier (Friday, 5 March)

3.2.1 Emphasize on undefined cps Oliver Meyer (Thursday, 4 March)

FW: Encoding detection again ... Miles Sabin (Tuesday, 2 March)

Suspected bug in XML 1.0 productions Dave Raggett (Tuesday, 2 March)

Re: Confusion about conditional sections John Cowan (Friday, 19 February)

AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More billkupp@jersey.net (Monday, 15 February)

comment concerning section 2.7 "CDATA Sections" in theXML specif ication GignacDA@nswccd.navy.mil (Wednesday, 10 February)

Maximize your website's traffic! janet9981@yahoo.com (Monday, 1 February)

XML 1.0: Treatment of entities in the comment. Constantine Plotnikov (Thursday, 28 January)

PE Handling (again :-) David Brownell (Monday, 25 January)

complete solution to your VIDEO DUPLICATION needs portfoli@together.net (Saturday, 23 January)

toner supplies jblonghorn34@domain.ch (Wednesday, 20 January)

PCDATA: possible error in XML spec Stefan Mintert (Monday, 4 January)

Last message date: Tuesday, 23 March 1999 22:16:49 UTC