- From: <chchou@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:21:01 -0500
- To: xml-editor@w3.org
Hi, I just finished reading the XML 1.0 spec (REC-xml-19980210) and have some questions which you may have answers. (1) I have seen PEReference (spec [69]) being used in places where either a Name or keyword is expected. For examples, in section 3.2 %name.para; is used as a Name and in section 3.4 %draft; and %final; are used as keywords. However, I could not find any production rule in the spec saying this is legal. Also, section 4.4 does not list any of those places as a legal context of PEReference. So I think spec [45] instead should explicitly say [45] elementdecl ::= '<ELEMENT' S (Name | PEReference) S contentspec S? '>' Similarly, specs [62] and [63] instead should explicitly say the followings respectively: ('INCLUDE' | PEReference) ('IGNORE' | PEReference) Am I missing something? (2) The specs [62] and [63] mentioned above allow optional space around a keyword. Comparing to spec [19], no space is allowed before and after the keyword CDATA? Is there a reason or purpose for this inconsistency? (3) In spec [64] the markups of ignoreSectContents are '<![' and ']]>'. The square brackets are not balanced which is not well-formed to me. Is there a reason that ']>' can not be used instead? Thank you in advance for your answers. Chih-Hsiang Chou IBM Center for Java Technology - Silicon Valley (O) 408-777-5817, Internet: chchou@us.ibm.com Tie Line: 240-5817, LN: Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 1999 20:21:34 UTC