- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:40:55 +0100
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On 04/07/2019 19:09, Wojciech Kosek wrote: > > Ladies and gentlemen! > Why using the Unicode U+0387 is not under the requirements of the > Unicode Normalization Form C? > Probably it is the reason why one can read > (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/raised_point), 'For technical reasons > (U+0387) reproduces in Wiktionary as the Latin middle dot (U+00B7).' fwiw, though not germaine to this list, U+0387 normalises to U+00B7 in NFC (Unicode normalisation form C). So it's unlikely to be found in a document that's normalised unless the author used an escape - in which case they'll get the validator message: "Text run is not in Unicode Normalization Form C." The Unicode Standard description for U+0387 says [ • functions in Greek like a semicolon • 00B7 is the preferred character ≡ 00B7 middle dot ] ri
Received on Friday, 5 July 2019 10:40:59 UTC