Re: [Fwd: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-i18n-html-tech-char-20040509/]

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:

> What about serving it as something other than text/html? Per [2], it
> seems like application/xhtml+xml is appropriate.

Indeed that would seem appropriate.  But of course that leaves you with
less browser support than HTML.

-- 
Nick Kew

Received on Monday, 2 August 2004 18:30:58 UTC