- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:12:26 -0700
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Chris Eppstein <chris@eppsteins.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Forgot to respond to this line: >> >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Chris Eppstein <chris@eppsteins.net> >> wrote: >> > An issue we're bumping into in the sass community now is namespace >> > collisions from 3rd-party libraries. It would be nice if CSS could avoid our >> > mistake by forcing a namespace for custom properties. >> >> That's why I'd prefer "underscore anywhere in the name" over "leading >> underscore" - you can put the namespace before the underscore, leading >> to a nice visual separation. > > Since we have -[vendor]- for custom vendor things, we could just reserve -- > for 'no vendor, just custom'... At least it's explainable/consistent. It has a nice ring to it, but I don't think it's substantially better than _. I can go either way. We'd have to use it for the other custom things, too (which is totally possible). ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 18:13:15 UTC