- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:48:52 +0200
- To: "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "'L. David Baron'" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: "'www-style list'" <www-style@w3.org>
± > (1) ignore the animation properties and don't apply any animations ± > ± > (2) honor the animation properties and freeze the animations at ± > time 0 ± > ± > I tend to think the correct answer is (1); ± ± This sounds correct to me. I agree with the general idea, but we may still want to provide people with a "print-as-rendered-on-the-screen-now" solution, or else we may get into this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OQeAl_ZYyMo There's nothing more annoying that being unable to put on a piece of paper what you're seeing right now on the screen because the developer did a bad job at making his stuff print-compatible (like: everything is 'opacity: 0' in the default stylesheet, only animations make stuff appear).
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 15:49:33 UTC