- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:58:22 -0700
- To: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wednesday 2013-05-22 11:24 +0200, Morten Stenshorne wrote: > I'm considering implementing object-fit [1] and object-position [2] in > Blink, and would like to hear other vendors' opinions on supporting > these properties, most importantly to figure out if anyone is negative, > but also to learn about any plans to implement them. As far as I know, > these properties are currently only supported in Presto, where it's -o- > prefixed, and it's also using an older version (working draft or even > editor's draft - not sure) of the spec. The spec has reached CR by now, > though. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-images-20120417/#the-object-fit > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/#the-object-position The properties seem fine to me. I don't think they're a priority to implement in the near future, but I think we (Mozilla) will probably do so eventually. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 23:59:00 UTC