- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:18:37 +0100
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "'fantasai'" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Rossen Atanassov" <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
TLDR: why not “repeat(<int>, (col-start) 100px (col-end), 10px)” ==> “(col-start) 100px (col-end) 10px ... 10px (col-start) 100px (col-end)”?
Reasoning: otherwise, if we want to replicate this behavior, we have to write “(col-start) 100px (col-end) repeat(<int-1>, 10px (col-start) 100px (col-end))” which is counter-intuitive (and I remember we thought it was annoying to have to define “function(<length> [, <length>]*)” instead of “function([<length>]{,}+)” and this seems like a similar issue here).
Thoughts?
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 23:19:40 UTC