- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:56:19 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/14/2012 04:43 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 09/14/2012 03:40 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: >>> Thoughts? >> >> Two nits: >> >> (a) s/flex ratios/flex factors/ at the end there. >> >> (b) It's unclear what "such lengths" refers to, in the second sentence. >> It suggests that it's referring to something in the first sentence, but >> the first sentence doesn't mention lengths at all -- just factors. >> Maybe replace "such lengths" with "zero-<length> <flex-basis> values", >> or something? > > Ok, fixed: > > # A unitless zero that is not already preceded by two flex factors must > # be interpreted as a flex factor. To avoid misinterpretation or invalid > # declarations, authors must specify a zero <flex-basis> component with > # a unit or precede it by both flex ratios. Still needs part "(a)" that I mentioned (ratios --> factors), but otherwise looks good to me! (Speaking of which -- the ED still has a lot of instances of "ratio" that want to be "factor" now (aside from "flex shrink ratio" in section 9.7 where it has a specific non-'factor' meaning)) ~Daniel
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 23:56:48 UTC