- From: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:27:44 -0700
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:57:40 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > > RESOLVED: CSSOM should have an interface for editors that does not > interfere with the existing interfaces. > > > > I think the CSS WG agreed that this would be a separate specification if > "we" were to do this. > I sort of gave up replying to the thread on CSSOM views after the last 3 emails got completely ignored. I have an alternate proposal to CSSOM Views. It is not accompanied by test cases. I have not published it, for this and other reasons. However, It avoids other significant problems of CSSOM Views, most of which I have not discussed yet. Whether it introduces new problems could be better revealed in test cases. Regards, Garrett > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/> > >
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 02:28:21 UTC