- From: <chiaki@dark-chiaki.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 18:16:33 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hm, sounds good, but when similar to url(), expr() and now size(), than it should read like this: ... url(picture) pos(1em 1em) size(20% 50%) ... more1() more2() ... So you'll have a similar syntax for all, and it would be easy to remember. Regards, Peter > From: Ognyan Kulev <ogi@fmi.uni-sofia.bg> > > Bert Bos wrote: > > ... 1em 1em (20% 50%)... > > ... 1em 1em size(20% 50%)... > > The rationale is similarity with url() and future expr(). Drawbacks are > not compact syntax and too much uniqueness in CSS specs. > > Regards, > ogi >
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2006 16:16:57 UTC