- From: Anne van Kesteren (fora) <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:41:55 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-style@w3.org
>>Let me give you one of the examples Tantek provided using CSS1 syntax (I >>hope): >> >> background: lime; >> background: red url(fancy-lime-pattern-returns-404); >> >>This will be read as (or similar, probably using a hex value): >> >> background: red; >> >>Using (assuming the whole "serie" must "pass" in CSS3): >> >> background: red url(fancy-lime-pattern-returns-404), lime; >> >>Would solve this problem and it can be made backwards compatible as >>well, since a comma is not part of the 'background' property in CSS 2.1. > > But that is two properties, not one: > > background-color: red, lime; > background-image: url(404), none; > > You want all the background-* properties to be linked? Yes, I think so. General rules are better than having specific rules for 'shorthand' properties imo. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 13:42:13 UTC