- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:04:26 +0200
- To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, www-style@w3.org
On Friday, April 2, 2004, 12:56:19 AM, Philip wrote: PT> David Woolley wrote: >>>to deactivate 'blink' but that would also deactivate underlines, >>>overlines, etc. which is not desirable if I just want blink free >>>web pages. >>> >> >> >> Seems to me that there is a bug in CSS if blink is something you >> want to disable orthogonally to other text decorations. PT> Why ? If the user suffers from epilepsy, disabling "blink" PT> (but not disabling underline or whatever) would seem to be PT> an eminently sensible decision. Blink is not required to be supported for conformance. It strikes me that a user agent could have a user preference whether blink is honored or not. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 01:14:27 UTC