- From: Chris Wilson (PSD) <cwilso@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 08:30:48 -0800
- To: "'neil@bigpic.com'" <neil@bigpic.com>, Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Neil St.Laurent [SMTP:neil@bigpic.com] wrote: >I think it should state something to the effect that if an @font-face >with the same face name is declared in multiple places then the >most recent declaration in the current media block is to be used >and other ones ignored. You missed part of what Chris (Lilley) said - >Same font-family name, font-weight, font-size font-style and >font-variant (all are used to perform a match). One of them is ignored. >The spec does not currently state which one is ignored. If you think >it should, I welcome your suggestions for a rule. In addition, the character range should also be used to perform a match (on a character-by-character basis). If there is an actual conflict (all values match for a given character in multiple font face declarations), then I agree with you, the most recent value should be used. -Chris Chris Wilson cwilso@microsoft.com ***
Received on Friday, 5 December 1997 11:31:09 UTC