- From: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:08:32 +0000
- To: "John Foliot - WATS.ca" <foliot@wats.ca>
- CC: 'Thufir' <hawat.thufir@gmail.com>, www-html@w3.org
Well, not "preposterous", but possibly oxymoronic. Thufir, John's point (if it is unclear) is that there is no such concept as "sufficiently valid"; either a document is valid, or it is not : there are no in-between states (/tertium non datur/). Of course, there are certain projects currently underway that seek to re-define "valid", but that is another matter entirely ... Philip TAYLOR -------- John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote: >> The HTML was sufficiently valid for my purposes, it was more a matter >> of >> knowing how to use the tags. (The HTML was generated by Jakarta ECS, >> BTW.) >> > > > Am I the only one on a "standards" mailing list that finds this statement preposterous? I hope that whomever Thufir finds to answer his question provides a sufficiently useful answer - it might not be the *right* answer of course, but it might suffice. > > Head back down... > > JF > >
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 17:09:27 UTC