- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:15:26 +0100
- To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- Cc: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
comments inlined I could try to produce a distributable for Level 1 Core by tomorrow in order to raise issues, if necessary, but at least sanity check. /Dimitris On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 08:14 , Arnold, Curt wrote: > I'm not going to be much help since my cable modem is down till > Wednesday > plus I'm prepping for a trip this week and will be on the road next > week. > > I don't have any objections to relocated the patch files, however their > location wouldn't have any impact on the distributables for a release. > If > someone is going to move them, they should update build.xml to point to > the > latest DOM 3 WD's at the same time. > > Some questions on the distributables for the release: > > 1. Do we provide separate distributables for Java and ECMAScript > bindings? > [dd] Open issue, no personal preference. I'd think it's simpler to have one distributable, but as I said, I have no personal preference. > 2. Do we include: > > A) DOMTSML test source > [dd] I think we should. > B) Doxygen generated documentation for Java tests > [dd] Open issue, people's views? > C) Test matrix. If so, would somebody like to pretty up the test matrix > XSLT > [dd] I think we should, to give people an entry point to the DOM TS. What is the XSLT in need of? > 3. How do we handle the dependency of the JSUnit tests on the relative > location of JSUnit? I've thought it might be technically possible to > eliminate that dependency, but I haven't spent serious time on it. > [dd] I haven't been able to look into this either.
Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 15:15:16 UTC