- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:56:57 +0200
- To: "'Ben Adida'" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "'Bonner, Matt'" <matt.bonner@hp.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "'Henri Sivonen'" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, <www-archive@w3.org>
I can see no way for scientific journals to include RDFa information in HTML because they usually do not use HTML as a primary medium. They have their own established ways to express information about published content; their HTML counterpart, if any, should use HTML+CSS to do it the same way. The gain from including license information about bibliographic references is actually a loss (of clarity) to me. This information should be available where the referenced publication appears, not where it is referenced. Chris -----Original Message----- From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net] Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 10:52 PM To: Kristof Zelechovski Cc: 'Bonner, Matt'; 'Julian Reschke'; 'Ian Hickson'; 'Dan Brickley'; 'Tab Atkins Jr.'; 'Henri Sivonen'; www-archive@w3.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] Creative Commons Rights Expression Language Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > Scientific journals are usually printed on paper and such information is > presented in small print. The recommended element provided for this purpose > in HTML is SMALL, if you insist. So the web should be nothing more than the equivalent of a printed page? You see no value at all in scientific journals marking up authors, paper titles, MESH tags (for life sciences), review status, license etc...? And you don't see a value in doing so in, say, a page that lists 10 related papers? -Ben
Received on Monday, 25 August 2008 08:01:27 UTC