Re: Issue 289: Faults

+1, yep, we've discussed this before as well.

Martin Gudgin wrote:
> I propose we close this editorial issue[1] with no action. In general we
> are silent about how messages are routed. Faults are no different in the
> current processing model.
> 
> Gudge
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x289

Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 09:57:04 UTC