- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:37:58 +0100
- To: www-archive@w3.org
- Message-Id: <41256B1B.0034F0D9.00@ambem5.eps.agfa.be>
---------------------- Forwarded by Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER on 2001-12-07 10:37 AM --------------------------- -----------------+-----------------------------------------+------------------ (Embedded image Jos De_Roo - 00 32 3 444 6256 2001-12-07 10:33 moved to file: Agfa-Gevaert N.V. - Mortsel - Belgium AM pic23084.pcx) Corporate Research Centre on Electronic Imaging Systems To: Janet Daly <janet@w3.org> @ BAYERNOTES cc: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>, ned.smith@intel.com, jeremy_carroll@hp.com, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, connolly@w3.org, hendler@cs.umd.edu, web-archive@w3.org Subject: communications & inconsistencies [was: Re: Clarification: TAG Election Results Announced to Members and Public on 11 December 2001] (Document link: Jos De_Roo) Hi Janet, > Earlier today, I sent an announcement [0] which was inconsistent in > identifying the Member and Public Announcement date for the TAG Election > Results. The correct date is Tuesday 11 December 2001, not Monday 10 > December 2001. that is a wonderful sentence! (forgive me that i'm biased by RDF and so) i mean, *knowing* an inconsistency is quite interesting the real reason for this mail is that we look (within a subgroup of WebOnt) into requirements, and i'm particularly looking into proofs of inconsistencies (which really sounds worse than it actually is) i.e. Re: Use case categories - 1st cut (action due by Thurs) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Thu, Dec 06 2001) -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2001Dec/0013.html I'm sure you can tell more about communications & inconsistencies... Thanks in advance! -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: pic23084.pcx
Received on Friday, 7 December 2001 04:38:39 UTC