RE: New Topic: Audio and Video Compliance: Transcripts vs Closed Captions

If the transcription is done correctly then it benefits all. I am a screen reader user and was using a training online platform where the transcriptions component is what I was using to get through the course. It provide the same information as the online video. Saved myself a lot of time. Also transcriptions is a valuable resource for deaf and blind, ESL people.

If the Multi-media player is accessible. Then the captions benefits someone who is deaf and blind.

[https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/02_standard_ciscoblue02.png]
Sean Murphy
SR ENGINEER.SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
seanmmur@cisco.com<mailto:seanmmur@cisco.com>
Tel: +61 2 8446 7751




Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Forum 201 Pacific Highway
ST LEONARDS
2065
Australia
cisco.com
[http://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif]
Think before you print.
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
Please click here<http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/terms-sale-software-license-agreement/company-registration-information.html> for Company Registration Information.


From: Starry Sky <Starry_sky@live.com>
Sent: Saturday, 31 August 2019 4:44 AM
To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>; Jacqueline Beverly <Jacqueline.Beverly@columbiasouthern.edu>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Topic: Audio and Video Compliance: Transcripts vs Closed Captions


Hi Jacqueline, please don't forget the inclusion of audio descriptions (WCAG AA) along with captions and transcripts.  I am a firm believer in crafting policies to benefit users/recipients of those policies first and meeting regulatory guidance second.  Hopefully your instructional design team also considers universal and inclusive design as a benefit to maximize the learning opportunity and not just as a requirement to meet compliance.

Captions are good for synchronized information while transcripts are beneficial for overviews/scanning and in searching for specific text without having to go through the entire video.  However, captions and transcripts are only helpful for those who can see and interpret the visuals but they are far less helpful for those who are not able to clearly see or interpret the visuals but can still "hear" the audio.

Those with vision limitations may also be limited by a presenter's strong accent or visual elements (actions/movements, charts, images, etc.) just as those with autism or trouble with focus may be challenged to pick up on key visual clues and mannerisms.  Audio transcripts help bridge that gap.

Hope this helps!
Skye

-------- Original Message --------
From: Jonathan Avila<mailto:jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 11:41 AM CDT
Subject: RE: New Topic: Audio and Video Compliance: Transcripts vs Closed Captions
To: Jacqueline Beverly<mailto:Jacqueline.Beverly@columbiasouthern.edu>, W3c-wai-ig<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Jacqueline, generally transcripts do not provide the same experience as captions which are synchronized with the media allowing the user to watch the same content and view equivalents for the audio track.  The WCAG 2 AA standards require captions but not transcripts for synchronized multimedia.  Transcripts for multimedia are currently WCAG AAA although many people find them helpful and these may be needed for some populations such as people who are deafblind.  The recommended approach would be to provide both captions and transcripts with captions being needed for multimedia under WCAG 2 AA.

Jonathan

Jonathan Avila, CPWA
Chief Accessibility Officer
Level Access
jon.avila@levelaccess.com<mailto:jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
703.637.8957 office
Visit us online:
Website<http://www.levelaccess.com/> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/LevelAccessA11y> | Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/LevelAccessA11y/> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/level-access> | Blog<http://www.levelaccess.com/blog/>

[The                    State of Digital Accessibility 2019 report is here!                    Download the report today to read the findings. Level                    Access]<https://levelaccess.com/state-of-digital-accessibility-2019>

The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

From: Jacqueline Beverly <Jacqueline.Beverly@columbiasouthern.edu><mailto:Jacqueline.Beverly@columbiasouthern.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 11:49 AM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Subject: New Topic: Audio and Video Compliance: Transcripts vs Closed Captions

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My instructional design team is currently reviewing our ADA policies and processes to ensure we are remaining compliant. An item we are stuck on and could really use some guidance is transcripts vs closed captions. Our current process requires us to provide a transcript for all audio and video in our courses. We do not require closed captioning, but sometimes it is included. Can anyone tell me if we are required to offer closed captioning too? Looking at the standards and guidelines and other sites, I have read contradictory information. Thanks!

[cid:part11.F099E445.8CE25F92@live..com]
Jacqueline Beverly
Assistant Director - Instructional Design, Instructional Design and Technology
Columbia Southern University
800.977.8449  ext: 1873
21982 University Lane | Orange Beach, AL 36561
ColumbiaSouthern.edu