Re: Usage of Articles

I agree the LI elements are over kill.

Jon


From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com<mailto:lwatson@paciellogroup.com>>
Organization: The Paciello Group (TPG)
Reply-To: Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com<mailto:lwatson@paciellogroup.com>>
Date: Friday, March 27, 2015 at 8:00 AM
To: "davebest@cogeco.ca<mailto:davebest@cogeco.ca>" <davebest@cogeco.ca<mailto:davebest@cogeco.ca>>, "chaals@yandex-team.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru>" <chaals@yandex-team.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru>>, 'Oscar' <oscar.cao@live.com<mailto:oscar.cao@live.com>>, W3C WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: Usage of Articles
Resent-From: W3C WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Friday, March 27, 2015 at 8:00 AM

David Best wrote:
“The major problem I see:
Why is each <article> enclosed in a separate <li> </li>? This adds verbosity and little structural information.”

It may be useful to know how many comments there are?

Léonie.

--
Léonie Watson Senior accessibility engineer, TPG
@LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup PacielloGroup.com