- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 21:45:34 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 07/05/2014 19:08, Felix Miata wrote: > Note that none of those images actually show what they are intended to > show unless either they are opened in a viewer which has adjusted their > size such that the embedded 1" images in fact measure 1" wide, or the > viewing system has a 144DPI display. Translated: unless you run this non-standard setup that I use, the images won't make the point that on my non-standard setup I'm not getting what I expect, which the vast majority of the web also doesn't do. > In summary, an ideal foundation for any site requires (even though not > addressed in WCAG): Then try to address it in WCAG. It does seem, though, that if this was indeed such a problem, there would be a far greater outcry about this apparent omission. > 1-do not size objects in px > 2-do not deviate body text from 1rem. IOW, deviate text size from 1rem > only as contextually appropriate (e.g. subscript, superscript, footer, > heading, caption, etc.). While in a recent thread we had references to Dostoevsky and post-modernism, I'll show my far less cultured roots and give you a quote from the motion picture "The Big Lebowski": "Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man." http://i1086.photobucket.com/albums/j445/xihaolong/yeah-well-thats-just-like-your-opinion-man.gif P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2014 20:45:58 UTC