- From: jonathan chetwynd <jonathan@signbrowser.free-online.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 19:56:09 +0100
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
You still appear to be missing the point that all the precise definitions are worthless, if they do not suit the purpose. Clocks come in many forms, we all want ones that work, caesium might have been the most accurate, but you wouldn't have worn one on your wrist when it was the de facto standard. A clock that only tells the time you want is a little dangerous, it may not run for long. The facility to claim that the maker told you that was how it kept the time is a conceit. W3C is obviously doing some fine work It is evident that there is a gross lack of knowledge concerning illiteracy within WAI. This needs to be addressed. The writing will fall out later. jay@peepo.com Our site www.peepo.com is a drive thru. When you see a link of interest, click on it. Move the mouse to slow down. It is a graphical aid to browsing the www. We value your comments.
Received on Friday, 11 June 1999 15:15:49 UTC