Re: request for comment

Thanks
I was only asking if there are perspectives from this list


On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 8:54 PM adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com> wrote:

> Although I get posting from this forum, I'm not sure if I can post.
> If I've understood correctly this is a commercialisation of the
> unallocated block still in the possession of WIDE with a charitable
> (Research and education) purpose for the proceeds.
> That seems appropriate.
> I'm unfamiliar with the process by which the numbers are translated into
> names, obviously, some names and some top-level name groups have more value
> than others.
> As with all markets, there is a bittersweet side to it, e.g. some may bid
> for blocks and sell on.
>
> Are you thinking about how these blocks might be used for semantic naming?
>
> btw. I also found the potted history very moving.
>
> Best,
>
> Adam Saltiel
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 5:48 AM, Paola Di Maio paola.dimaio@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Announcement regarding IPv4 Address Block 43/8
>> http://www.wide.ad.jp/News/2020/20200325_e.html
>>
>> would someone want to throw two cents and comment on implications/impact
>> of this announcement?
>>
>> Thankyo
>>
>>