Re: Request for RDB2RDF mappings

Hi Harry,

Sure, it is clear that what Jose was referring to was to any type of
RDB2RDF mappings (which include D2R ones, R2O ones, and any other similar
ones that we may not be aware of). He was not referring only to R2RML ones.

Regards,
  Oscar


-- 

Oscar Corcho
Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Facultad de Informática
Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, España
Tel. (+34) 91 336 66 05
Fax  (+34) 91 352 48 19






El 27/01/11 22:59, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org> escribió:

>On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jose Mora <jmora@fi.upm.es> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am working with RDB2RDF mappings, I am studying the way these
>>mappings,
>> usually providing instances, relate with the ontologies (T-Box) and thus
>> with the classes for these instances. Specially, the coverage that
>>mappings
>> provide to the ontology wrt instances and the inference that the
>>ontology
>> adds to the underlying RDB. I am requesting your help to increase my
>> collection of mappings and ontologies to a representative sample of the
>> state of the art and current status of mappings and mapped ontologies
>>(when
>> using specific ontologies). All mapping files and ontologies either
>>attached
>> or linked by mail are greatly welcome.
>
>Since RDB2RDF is still a maturing standard, you probably want a
>collection of D2RQ mappings, as they are likely not tooo many RDB2RDF
>mappings out there. D2RQ is used quite a bit in the wild.
>
>       cheers,
>        harry
>
>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance,
>>
>>     Jose Mora.
>>
>

Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 15:40:45 UTC