- From: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:03:40 +0000
- To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>
- CC: nathan@webr3.org, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 04/11/10 14:00, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: > Le 04/11/2010 14:54, Nathan a écrit : >> Makes sense, so, many recent docs, formal and informal, mention >> explicitly "URI Reference" rather than "RDF URI Reference", "URI" or >> "IRI" - for future docs which term should be used? > > I guess IRI should be the best choice. BTW, the OWL 2 specifications > exclusively rely on IRIs in place where OWL 1 was using URIs and URI > references. +1. SPARQL uses IRI [1] Damian [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#QSynIRI>
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 14:04:30 UTC