- From: rick <rick@rickmurphy.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:36:52 -0400
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod@w3.org
Danny & All: Of course there's been a lot of work on this subject over the years. You can find one nice piece on analogical reasoning here [1]. But for linked data to become useful it's important to refine our understanding of web architecture beginning with the language of resources. I'm currently working up a piece for my blog on this topic. Stay tuned. That being said, I have recommended that the US and UK governments engage in creating a Linked Data roadmap. One essential element of that road map would include a lifecycle for how linked data publishers and linked data consumers could work towards the goals of linked data without the oversight of a directed authority. 1. http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/analog.htm -- Rick cell: 703-201-9129 web: http://www.rickmurphy.org blog: http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org Danny Ayers wrote: > The human reading online texts has a fair idea of what is and what > isn't relevant, but how does this work for the Web of data? Should we > have tools to just suck in any nearby triples, drop them into a model, > assume that there's enough space for the irrelevant stuff, filter > later? > > How do we do (in software) things like directed search without the human agent? > > I'm sure we can get to the point of - analogy - looking stuff up in > Wikipedia & picking relevant links, but we don't seem to have the user > stories for the bits linked data enables. Or am I just > imagination-challenged? > > Cheers, > Danny. >
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 11:40:32 UTC