- From: Mike Linksvayer <ml@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:00:38 -0700
- To: Semantic community Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Renato Iannella<renato@nicta.com.au> wrote: > On 21 Aug 2009, at 02:10, Ben Adida wrote: >> John Graybeal wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone know of a good ontology, umm, highly structured vocabulary >>> in RDF or OWL, of open source licenses? Ideally it would be reasonably >>> complete; not so critical that it be ontologically rich. >> >> It's not complete for the purpose , but you can start with the Creative >> Commons schema: >> >> http://creativecommons.org/ns > > > Before you do, read the CC FAQ: > > http://wiki.creativecommons.org/FAQ > > "Can I use a Creative Commons license for software? > We do not recommend it..." That doesn't mean you can't use the vocabulary to describe software licenses, as the FSF recently did, see http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2009-06-rdf and http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/15406 Mike https://creativecommons.net/ml
Received on Friday, 21 August 2009 00:01:19 UTC