- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:26:02 -0400
- To: kidehen@openlinksw.com, Linking Open Data <linking-open-data@simile.mit.edu>
- CC: 'SW-forum' <semantic-web@w3.org>, "'Benjamins, Robin'" <rxbenjam@bechtel.com>, "'Paap, Onno'" <onno.paap@gmail.com>, 'Sandro Hawke' <sandro@w3.org>
Kingsley Idehen wrote: > Sandro, > > Yes, but what is a non-information resource :-) This is the problem. > Something that is technically right (i.e. the opposite of an information > resource) but a poor vehicle of communication when articulating > identifying and dereferencing distributed objects connected by the Web Bus. > > Generic Resource or Data Resource provide a cleaner description of > something that isn't ready for Web Bus traversal in it's basic form. > > This matter is just about terminology that enables us build a bridge > from the core Semantic Web community, out to the broader Web Communities. > > Here are some Links that dig into this issue of non-information resource > terminology: > > 1. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html (uses: > Generic Resource) > The link should have been: http://www.openarchives.org/ore/documents/CompoundObjects-200705.html -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 16:26:29 UTC