- From: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:36:39 -0400
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Stefano Mazzocchi <stefanom@mit.edu>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Oct 24, 2005, at 8:16 AM, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > Le jeudi 20 octobre 2005 à 14:25 -0500, Dan Connolly a écrit : > >>> Would be even better if the online service returned MIME-type was >>> application/rdf+xml instead of an opaque application/xml, that >>> way, you >>> could also see it with Piggy Bank glasses ;-) >>> >> >> On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 14:17 +0100, Ian Davis wrote: >> >>> If you send application/rdf+xml in the accept header then the >>> service >>> will now output that in preference. Everyone else gets >>> application/xml >>> >> >> Ours should work that way to. >> >> Dom, do you know if this is easy to do? >> > > I can (and made it) output the results using application/rdf+xml; I > can't easily set up the content negotiation aspect. Thanks Dom for making this change! I can almost now look at this via piggy-bank [1], but it looks like there is no classes (Person, Document, etc.) declared in this instance data. I'm not sure if the problem is with the markup, or the transform or simply that the data hasn't been included. Ian, is this intentional? [1] http://simile.mit.edu/piggy-bank/ -- eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/ semantic web activity lead http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ w3c world wide web consortium http://www.w3.org/
Received on Monday, 24 October 2005 15:36:47 UTC