- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:26:18 -0400
- To: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org, public-ws-policy@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9B28A7C0.1BF8956B-ON852571B7.005A218A-852571B7.005A4CD8@us.ibm.com>
All, I have taken a stab at a proposed namespace versioning policy, that would be stated both in the specification and in the namespace document (RDDL). This is derived from other standards work, most specifically the OASIS WS-RX TC's policy for it namespace. Proposed Namespace URI Versioning Policy: It is the intent of the W3C WS-Policy Working Group that the WS-Policy Framework v1.5 and WS-Policy Attachment v1.5 namespace URI will not change arbitrarily with each subsequent revision of the corresponding XML Schema documents but rather change only when a subsequent revision, published as a WD, CR or PR draft results in non-backwardly compatible changes from a previously published WD, CR or PR draft of the specification. Under this policy, the following are examples of backwards compatible changes that would not result in assignment of a new namespace URI: * addition of new global element, attribute, complexType and simpleType definitions * addition of new elements or attributes in locations covered by a previously specified wildcard * modifications to the pattern facet of a type definition for which the value-space of the previous definition remains valid or for which the value-space of the preponderance of instance would remain valid * modifications to the cardinality of elements for which the value-space of possible instance documents conformant to the previous revision of the schema would still be valid with regards to the revised cardinality rule Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440 phone: +1 508 377 9295
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 16:26:37 UTC