public-swbp-wg@w3.org from March 2005 by author

Addison Phillips

• RFC 3066bis and the Semantic Web (Wednesday, 2 March)

Alan Rector

• Re: [OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 (Tuesday, 22 March)
• [SWBP]FAQ? (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Specified values (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Monday, 7 March)
• Specified values (Sunday, 6 March)
• Re: value partitions (Thursday, 3 March)
• [Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender] (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Tuesday, 1 March)

Benjamin Nguyen

• Re: [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page (Friday, 25 March)
• FAQ Editor (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: regrets for thursday telecon (Thursday, 24 March)

Bernard Vatant

• RE: Comments on "Survey of RDF/Topic Maps" (Wednesday, 30 March)
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Wednesday, 9 March)
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Wednesday, 9 March)
• RE: [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet (Tuesday, 8 March)

Bill McDaniel

• RE: [ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review (Monday, 28 March)

Chiusano Joseph

• RE: SW / ontology in telecommunication field (Sunday, 6 March)

Christopher Welty

• [ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F (Wednesday, 23 March)
• [ALL] new Editor's draft of classes as values available (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: [SWBP]FAQ? (Wednesday, 9 March)
• [ALL] versioning (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as values available] (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available - TITLE of NOTE (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Specified values (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Friday, 4 March)
• [SETF] recommended members (Thursday, 3 March)
• [OEP] simple part-whole note new draft (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Tuesday, 1 March)

Dan Brickley

• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: [ALL] agenda 24 March telecon (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet (Tuesday, 8 March)
• [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: archived IRC log for the f2f (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: [ALL] agenda (updated) Boston ftf (Tuesday, 1 March)

Dan Connolly

• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Thursday, 31 March)
• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (Wednesday, 23 March)

Daniel Oberle

• Re: [SE] Suggested agenda for next telecon (Tues 15th March 1pm EST) (Tuesday, 15 March)
• RE: [SE] Comments on Draft Note (Tuesday, 1 March)

David Wood

• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Sunday, 27 March)
• SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Saturday, 26 March)
• [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Review of RDFTM Survey (Wednesday, 2 March)
• [SE] More Comments on Draft Note (Wednesday, 2 March)

DeborahL.McGuinness

• telecon regrets for thurs march 24 (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: [ALL] apdate #2: agenda Boston ftf (Thursday, 3 March)

Evan K. Wallace

• re:[OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note (Tuesday, 8 March)
• [OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note (Tuesday, 8 March)

ewallace@cme.nist.gov

• Re: [SE] Agenda of the SETF telecon today (Tuesday, 29 March)
• RE: [ALL] proposal to publish XSCH WD (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: [ALL] Re: [XSCH] new editors draft (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: [SWBP]FAQ? (Wednesday, 9 March)

Fabien Gandon

• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 (Thursday, 24 March)
• [Fwd: Re: Question scenario RDF in XHTML] (Friday, 4 March)

Fabio Vitali

• R:comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Thursday, 10 March)

Govoni, Darren

• RE: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Thursday, 31 March)
• regrets for Thursday 3/24 (Tuesday, 22 March)

Guus Schreiber

• [ALL] agenda 24 March telecon (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as values available] (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: [SWBP]FAQ? (Wednesday, 9 March)
• [ALL] March 10 telecon CANCELLED (Monday, 7 March)
• [ALL] apdate #2: agenda Boston ftf (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: [ALL] agenda (updated) Boston ftf (Wednesday, 2 March)

IC Dept.- MIT-Maqbool Al Maimani

• RE: SW / ontology in telecommunication field (Sunday, 6 March)

Ivan Herman

• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F (Tuesday, 22 March)

Jeff Pan

• [SE] Reviewers Needed (Tuesday, 29 March)
• [SE,ALL] Invited Expert Needed (Tuesday, 29 March)
• [SE] Outcome to Telecon 29 March 2005 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• [SE] Agenda of the SETF telecon today (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: [ALL] proposal to publish XSCH WD (Thursday, 24 March)
• [SE] ODA draft available from the SE homepage (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: [SE] Outcome to Telecon 16th March 2005 (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: [ALL] Re: [XSCH] new editors draft (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: [XSCH] new editors draft (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/ (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: [SE] Draft Note - Initial changes following first informal meeting at tech plenary (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: [SE] Comments on Draft Note (Wednesday, 2 March)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Monday, 28 March)
• [ALL] proposal to publish XSCH WD (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: [XSCH] new editors draft (Tuesday, 22 March)
• [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Thursday, 17 March)
• [ALL] Re: [XSCH] new editors draft (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: [XSCH] new editors draft (Tuesday, 15 March)
• [XSCH] new editors draft (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: [SWBP]FAQ? (Wednesday, 9 March)
• What do HTTP URIs Identify? (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG (Friday, 4 March)
• possible DRAFT msg to TAG (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: [SE] Comments on Draft Note (Wednesday, 2 March)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Wednesday, 30 March)

Lars Marius Garshol

• Regrets for Thursday's telcon (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: Review of RDFTM Survey (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: [RDFTM] Review of Survey Document (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: [RDFTM] Review of Survey Document (Tuesday, 1 March)

Libby Miller

• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 (Thursday, 24 March)

McBride, Brian

• RE: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Monday, 28 March)
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Tuesday, 22 March)

Mike Brand

• Typo in Approach 4? (Tuesday, 29 March)

Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)

• RE: [PORT] moving SKOS Core fwd (Tuesday, 29 March)
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Thursday, 24 March)
• [PORT] moving SKOS Core fwd (Thursday, 24 March)
• RE: [ALL] agenda 24 March telecon - PORT Actions (Thursday, 24 March)
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Thursday, 24 March)
• [PORT] SKOS Core spec and guide (was RE: A problem RE: Dereferencing SKOS Core) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• [PORT] mapping (Friday, 11 March)
• RE: [ALL] agenda (updated) Boston ftf (Tuesday, 1 March)

NANNI Marco RD-BIZZ-SOP

• RE : regrets for thursday telecon (Thursday, 24 March)

Natasha Noy

• Re: [ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review (Wednesday, 30 March)
• regrets for thursday telecon (Tuesday, 22 March)
• [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - Abstract (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as valuesavailable] (Tuesday, 8 March)
• [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available (Saturday, 5 March)
• [OEP] list of terms from the classes as values note (Saturday, 5 March)
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Friday, 4 March)
• archived IRC log for the f2f (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: Review of RDFTM Survey (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Review of RDFTM Survey (Wednesday, 2 March)

Patrick Durusau

• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Wednesday, 9 March)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG (Saturday, 5 March)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Thursday, 24 March)
• comment on new draft of RDFTM Survey (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Wednesday, 9 March)
• comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Tuesday, 8 March)

Peter Patel-Schneider

• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) (Thursday, 24 March)

Phil Tetlow

• [SE] Outcome to Telecon 16th March 2005 (Thursday, 6 November)
• Fw: [SE] Suggested agenda for next telecon (Tues 15th March 1pm EST) (Monday, 3 November)
• Latest version of ODA note (Thursday, 3 March)
• RE: [SETF] recommended members (Thursday, 3 March)
• Latest version of SE Draft (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: [SE] Draft Note - Initial changes following first informal meeting at tech plenary (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: SWSE (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: telco next week (Tuesday, 1 March)

Ralph R. Swick

• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: RDFTM comments: Swick (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: RDFTM: New draft of Survey (Wednesday, 23 March)
• [action completion] W3C URI Persistence Policy (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F (Tuesday, 22 March)
• meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F (Tuesday, 22 March)
• VM Task Force slides from f2f (Wednesday, 9 March)
• RDFTM slides as presented by Steve (Friday, 4 March)
• [RDFTM] comments on survey (Thursday, 3 March)

Steve Pepper

• RDFTM: Sort keys in RDF (Wednesday, 30 March)
• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) (Thursday, 24 March)
• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) (Thursday, 24 March)
• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (Wednesday, 23 March)
• RDFTM Disposition of Comments (Wednesday, 23 March)
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Wednesday, 23 March)
• RE: regrets for thursday telecon (Tuesday, 22 March)
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Tuesday, 22 March)
• RE: RDFTM comments: Uschold (Saturday, 19 March)
• RDFTM comments: Uschold (Friday, 18 March)
• RDFTM comments: Noy (Friday, 18 March)
• RDFTM comments: Wood (Friday, 18 March)
• RDFTM comments: Swick (Friday, 18 March)
• RDFTM comments: DanC (Friday, 18 March)
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 (Friday, 18 March)
• RDFTM: New draft of Survey (Thursday, 17 March)
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Sunday, 13 March)
• RE: R:comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Sunday, 13 March)
• RE: possible DRAFT msg to TAG (Sunday, 6 March)
• RE: Review of RDFTM Survey (Wednesday, 2 March)
• RE: Review of RDFTM Survey (Wednesday, 2 March)

Steven R. Newcomb

• Re: Comments on "Survey of RDF/Topic Maps" (Thursday, 31 March)
• Comments on "Survey of RDF/Topic Maps" (Tuesday, 29 March)

Thomas Baker

• Re: [PORT] SKOS maintenance policy - 2/2 (substantive comments) (Thursday, 31 March)
• [PORT] SKOS maintenance policy - 2/2 (substantive comments) (Wednesday, 30 March)
• [PORT] SKOS maintenance policy - 1/2 ("minor errata") (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG (Saturday, 5 March)

Thomas Baker (E-mail)

• W3C Persistence Policy and SKOS Core Vocabulary spec (Friday, 4 March)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 (Sunday, 27 March)

Uschold, Michael F

• RE: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 (Thursday, 24 March)
• [SE] FYI SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND FORMAL METHODS (Tuesday, 15 March)
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Monday, 14 March)
• RE: [SE] Suggested agenda for next telecon (Tues 15th March 1pm EST) (Monday, 14 March)
• FW: [Chat] UMBC Semantic Web Reference Card (Friday, 11 March)
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - Abstract (Thursday, 10 March)
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Wednesday, 9 March)
• RE: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as valuesavailable] (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: [OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as valuesavailable] (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available - TITLE of NOTE (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Monday, 7 March)
• RE: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Saturday, 5 March)
• [OEP] Action: Split out Note Conventions (Saturday, 5 March)
• [OEP, ALL] Naming Conventions for OWL code (Saturday, 5 March)
• FW: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Friday, 4 March)
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Friday, 4 March)
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Friday, 4 March)
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Thursday, 3 March)
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Thursday, 3 March)
• RE: [SETF] recommended members (Thursday, 3 March)
• [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review (Wednesday, 2 March)
• RE: [RDFTM] Review of Survey Document (Tuesday, 1 March)
• RE: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note (Tuesday, 1 March)
• [RDFTM] Review of Survey Document (Tuesday, 1 March)

Valentina Presutti

• R:comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: R:comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals (Saturday, 12 March)

Yoshio FUKUSHIGE

• Putting server added information to the result? (Tuesday, 22 March)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2005 22:02:03 UTC