Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?]

Yes, something like that. One could say

<blabla role="Collection">

</blabla>

with the immediate descendents of <blabla> playing the same role as the
<li>-s in the case of <ul>/<ol>. Or use the @role for those elements as
well to make things explicit.

Ivan

Toby Inkster wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2009, at 10:00, Ivan Herman wrote:
> 
>> This approach is not optimal either, because it is really bound to the
>> specifics of HTML.
> 
> 
> Maybe @role could help out here.
> 
> <ul> and <ol> trigger the rdf:List behaviour, but if you want to use a
> different HTML element (e.g. <div>), or are using a markup language
> other than HTML, then you can force rdf:List behaviour via @role.
> 
> <list xmlns:xhv="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#"
>       about="#mylist"
>       role="xhv:list">
> ...
> </list>
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf